Appeal No. 1997-1584 Application No. 08/353,375 2a representation of the depth dimension of various documents D1-D4 includes a visible indication of the top page but no visible indication of any hidden page, page number, or indicia thereon, intended to be selected under the top page. As pointed out by the Examiner (Answer, page 9), if there was a visible indication of the page, page number, or indicia thereon, to be selected in Saki, the user would be able to immediately drag the pointer to the page to select it rather than pointing to only the approximate page location as explicitly taught by Saki. In a related argument at page 11 of the Brief, Appellants contend that, contrary to their single-step selection of overlapping regions, Kimura discloses a two-part selection procedure. We find such a contention to be unfounded since2 it is not commensurate with the scope of representative claim 1. It is axiomatic that, in proceedings before the PTO, claims in an application are to be given their broadest reasonable interpretation consistent with the specification, 2In making this argument, it is apparent that Appellants’ reference to Kimura, rather than Saki, was inadvertent. 9Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007