Appeal No. 1997-1624 Application No. 08/384,816 a second insulating material extending from the bottom surface of the semiconductor substrate to the noncontinuous isolation layer. The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are: Cogan 4,860,081 Aug. 22, 1989 Tamagawa 5,045,900 Sep. 03, 1991 (effective filing date Oct. 27, 1988) Claims 19 through 23 and 25 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Tamagawa in view of Cogan. Reference is made to the Examiner's Answer (Paper No. 20, mailed October 31, 1996) for the examiner's complete reasoning in support of the rejections, and to appellant's Brief (Paper No. 18, filed May 6, 1996) and Reply Brief (Paper No. 21, filed January 7, 1997) for appellant's arguments thereagainst. OPINION As a preliminary matter we note that appellant indicates on page 3 of the Brief that the claims are not to stand or fall together. Appellant, however, discusses claims 19 and 25 together, and, therefore, fails to provide arguments as to the separate patentability of claim 25 in accordance with 37 CFR 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007