Ex parte BEASLEY - Page 1




                                           THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                                                
                     The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)                                                                                                    
                     was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is                                                                                                       
                     not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                 Paper No. 30                                          

                                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                                               
                                                                                __________                                                                                             
                                                      BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                                               
                                                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                                                             
                                                                                __________                                                                                             
                                                                  Ex parte REX W. BEASLEY                                                                                              
                                                                                __________                                                                                             
                                                                     Appeal No. 1997-1812                                                                                              
                                                                  Application 08/055,3821                                                                                              
                                                                               ___________                                                                                             
                                                                                  ON BRIEF                                                                                             
                                                                               ___________                                                                                             

                     Before ABRAMS, STAAB and GONZALES, Administrative Patent                                                                                                          
                     Judges.                                                                                                                                                           
                     STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                                               

                                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                                             
                                This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final                                                                                              
                     rejection of claims 1, 3-5, 7, 8, 11-20, 23-27, 30-33, 35 and                                                                                                     
                     36.     Claims 6, 9, 10, 21, 22, 28 and 29 have been allowed.2                                                                                                                                                           

                                1  Application for patent filed May 3, 1993.                                                                                                           
                                2 An amendment (Paper No. 19) filed subsequent to the                                                                                                  
                     final rejection has been entered.  See the advisory letter                                                                                                        
                                                                                          1                                                                                            





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007