The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KETAN SAMPAT, TROY ACOTT, GUNNER DANNEELS,
RAMAMURTHY SIVAKUMAR, and GALEN SPOONER
____________
Appeal No. 1997-1874
Application No. 08/134,025
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before JERRY SMITH, FLEMING, and GROSS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 6, 9 through 15, 18 through 22,
and 25 through 28, which are all of the claims pending in this
application.
Appellants' invention relates to a client, a server, and
a method for a network-based multicast system. The client
includes at least two media service providers for receiving
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007