Appeal No. 1997-1874 Application No. 08/134,025 include the same limitations found lacking above. Consequently, we cannot sustain the rejection of claims 19, 25, and their dependents, claims 20 through 22 and 26 through 28. CONCLUSION The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1 through 6, 9 through 15, 18 through 22, and 25 through 28 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed. REVERSED JERRY SMITH ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT MICHAEL R. FLEMING ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) ANITA PELLMAN GROSS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007