THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not
written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte BERNARD LE MOUEL, FRANCOIS-XAVIER
OLLIVIER, and JEAN-LUC PAMART
____________
Appeal No. 1997-1982
Application No. 08/483,886
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, FLEMING, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1, 2, and 4 through 7, which are all of
the claims pending in this application.
Appellants' invention relates to a device for optimizing
signal transmission performance in a system for transmitting
digital data on an optical link. The device controls a
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007