Appeal No. 1997-2150
Application No. 08/350,777
display in the second hollow body for the same reason that he
places the first display in the second hollow body. Further,
Becker discloses using the two displays for 3-D images mounted
to glasses or goggles, thereby suggesting that the two
displays should be horizontally aligned, not in separate
hollow bodies which are vertically displaced from one another.
Thus, the examiner again has failed to establish a prima facie
case of obviousness, so we cannot sustain the rejection of
claim 12.
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007