Ex parte HRUSKA et al. - Page 4




          Appeal No. 1997-2158                                       Page 4           
          Application No. 08/234,239                                                  


               The references relied on in rejecting the claims follow:               
          Francisco                4,845,715               Jul.  4, 1989              
          Griswold et al.         WO#93/01550               Jan. 21,                  
          1993.                                                                       
          (Griswold)                                                                  
          (Published PCT Application)                                                 

               Claims 1, 4-9, and 12-16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                
          § 103 as obvious over Francisco in view of Griswold.  Rather                
          than repeat the arguments of the appellants or examiner in                  
          toto, we refer the reader to the briefs and answers for the                 
          respective details thereof.                                                 


                                       OPINION                                        
               In reaching our decision in this appeal, we considered                 
          the  subject matter on appeal and the rejection advanced by                 
          the examiner.  Furthermore, we duly considered the arguments                
          and evidence of the appellants and examiner.  After                         
          considering the totality of the record, we are persuaded that               
          the examiner erred in rejecting claims 1, 4-9, and 12-16.                   
          Accordingly, we reverse.                                                    










Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007