Ex parte FORGIONE et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      

               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
               today (1) was not written for publication in a law                     
               journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the                        
               Board.                                                                 
                                                               Paper No. 15           
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    ____________                                      
                     Ex parte PETER S. FORGIONE, RAM B. GUPTA,                        
                      LAWRENCE A. FLOOD and DONALD H. VALENTINE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 1997-2196                                  
                             Application No. 08/138,581                               
                                    ____________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                    ____________                                      
          Before OWENS, ROBINSON, and LORIN, Administrative Patent                    
          Judges.                                                                     
          OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of               
          claims 1-37, which are all of the claims in the application.                
                                    THE INVENTION                                     










Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007