Ex parte PRYOR et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1997-2216                                                        
          Application No. 08/392,661                                                  


               Appellants' invention relates to an overcurrent                        
          protection arrangement including a switching circuit and a                  
          pulse generator which generates pulses up to a predetermined                
          maximum number or for a predetermined time to reset the                     
          switching circuit when the overcurrent ceases.  Claim 1 is                  
          illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads as                      
          follows:                                                                    
          1.   An overcurrent protection arrangement which comprises a                
          switching circuit which is                                                  
               (a) intended to be series connected in a line of a                     
          circuit to be protected,                                                    
               (b) has a conducting state in which it will allow normal               
          circuit currents to pass, and                                               
               (c) has an open state which it adopts when subjected to                
          an overcurrent, the arrangement including a pulse generator                 
          which takes power from a voltage difference across the                      
          switching circuit and which, when the switching circuit is in               
          the open state, will generate one or more pulses, up to a                   
          predetermined finite maximum number of pulses, or for a                     
          predetermined time, which will reset the switching circuit to               
          the conducting state if the switching circuit is no longer                  
          subjected to an overcurrent.                                                
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Zocholl et al. (Zocholl)           3,801,872                Apr.            
          02, 1974                                                                    
          Sears                         4,202,023                May  06,             
          1980                                                                        
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007