Ex parte YAGIHASHI et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)              
          was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is                 
          not binding precedent of the Board.                                         
                                                       Paper No. 11                   

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                              Ex parte FUJIO YAGIHASHI                                
                                and MINORU TAKAMIZAWA                                 
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 1997-2270                                  
                               Application 08/294,214                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      
          Before KIMLIN, OWENS and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.               
          OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of               
          claims 1 and 5-9, which are all of the claims remaining in the              
          application.                                                                
                                    THE INVENTION                                     
               Appellants claim a bisphenol derivative which, appellants              


                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007