THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 11 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte FUJIO YAGIHASHI and MINORU TAKAMIZAWA __________ Appeal No. 1997-2270 Application 08/294,214 ___________ ON BRIEF ___________ Before KIMLIN, OWENS and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges. OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 and 5-9, which are all of the claims remaining in the application. THE INVENTION Appellants claim a bisphenol derivative which, appellants 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007