Appeal No. 1997-2270
Application 08/294,214
time of appellants’ invention, or that any other process was
known in the art at that time which would have been effective
for protecting the hydroxyl groups of the admitted prior art
bisphenol derivative.
For the above reasons, we find that the examiner has not
set forth a factual basis which is sufficient for supporting a
conclusion of obviousness of the invention recited in any of
appellants’ claims. Consequently, we reverse the examiner’s
rejection.
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007