Ex parte BECHER et al. - Page 10




              Appeal No. 1997-2336                                                                                          
              Application No. 08/256,065                                                                                    
              of acetylsalicylic acid to provide blood levels between 0.1 to 1.0 microgram/ml. (Answer,                     
              page 4).                                                                                                      
                     The appellants have, also, submitted 16 references, listed above, in addition to                       
              Thun I, to establish that aspirin has efficacy in the prevention of several different cancers.                
              (Supplemental Reply Brief filed May 19, 1997).  We note, initially, that all of these                         
              documents were published after the effective filing date of the present application.                          
              (December 12, 1992).  Thus, they can not be said to represent the state of the art or the                     
              skill level of those in this art as of the filing date of this application.  They are of little               
              probative value for the proposition asserted by the appellants that the disclosure was                        
              sufficient at the time of filing of the application for patent to permit the practice of the                  
              invention without undue experimentation.  In re Wright, 999 F.2d 1557, 1562, 27 USPQ2d                        
              1510, 1514 (Fed. Cir. 1993) ("[A]ll of these developments occurred after the effective filing                 
              date of Wright's application and are of no significance regarding what one skilled in the art                 
              believed as of that date.").  The examiner, having reviewed these documents, maintained                       
              the position that the evidence may link aspirin to a  "reduction of risk" of cancer, but urges                
              that this was not equivalent to "prevention" as presently claimed.                                            
                     Having weighed all of the evidence of record, including the Wands factors, we find                     
              no error in the examiner's determination that the specification does not enable one skilled                   
              in this art to use the claimed invention throughout its scope without undue experimentation.                  
              Appellants have failed to provided evidence or arguments which, on balance, would be                          


                                                            10                                                              





Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007