Appeal No. 1997-2368
Application 08/158,782
The examiner's rejection of claims 1, 3-6, 8-10, 19, 20, 24, 25, 39-44, and 46-48
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over the combined teachings of Rodwell, Holder,
Goldenberg (‘525), and Brennan is reversed. The rejection of claims 1, 3-6, 8-10, 19, 20,
24, 25, 39-44, and 46-48 under the judicially created doctrine of obviousness-type double
patenting is reversed.
REVERSED
Douglas W. Robinson )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
Carol A. Spiegel ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
Toni R. Scheiner )
Administrative Patent Judge )
Foley & Lardner
3000 K Street, N.W., Suite 500
P. O. Box 25696
Washington, DC 20007-8696
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007