Ex parte SAITO et al. - Page 9




                 Appeal No. 1997-2387                                                                                                                   
                 Application No. 08/082,373                                                                                                             


                          According to the examiner, it would have been obvious to use the ferromagnetic                                                
                 particles of JP '161 as the particle reagent of Bernoco and the magnetic separation of JP                                              
                 '161 in place of the centrifugal separation of Bernoco because the ferromagnetic particles                                             
                 of JP '161 are physically and chemically uniform and stable, economically mass produced                                                
                 and specifically suggested as suitable carriers for agglutination reactions whereby                                                    
                 agglutination reaction time can be shortened by about half and because the process of                                                  
                 Bernoco not only encompasses both simple and complex agglutination reactions but also                                                  
                 makes possible reliable automated measurements using very small amounts of reagents                                                    
                 and specimen.  Noting that the process of Bernoco determines agglutination by the                                                      
                 amount of slippage observed after sedimentation, the examiner concludes that one of                                                    
                 ordinary skill in the art "would have been capable of providing the [necessary] inclination                                            
                 means ... subsequent to separation."  [Answer, p. 5, para. 2.]                                                                         
                          Here, we agree with appellants that the examiner has not established a prima facie                                            
                 case of obviousness because the fact that the prior art reference could be so modified to                                              
                 show the patented invention would not have made the modification obvious unless the prior                                              
                 art suggested the desirability of the modification.  In re Gordon, 733 F.2d 900, 902, 221                                              
                 USPQ 1125, 1127 (Fed. Cir. 1984).  First, the examiner has not explained what would                                                    
                 have motivated one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the process and apparatus of                                                 
                 Bernoco, directed to providing coaxially directed centrifugal force to agglutination                                                   


                                                                         - 9 -                                                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007