Appeal No. 1997-2387 Application No. 08/082,373 specification discloses "corresponding structure" for performing the function recited in the claim and take appropriate action, if deemed necessary. CONCLUSION To summarize, the decision of the examiner to (1) reject claims 1-3, 9, 10, 12-15 and 17-19 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Bernoco in view of JP '161 is reversed, (2) to reject claims 4 and 6 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Forrest is reversed, (3) to reject claim 5 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Forrest in view of Sakuma is reversed, and (4) to reject claim 7 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Forrest in view of the Takahashi abstract is reversed. REVERSED SHERMAN D. WINTERS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT CAROL A. SPIEGEL ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND - 12 -Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007