The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 29 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte ERIC JEAN-LUC PERRIER and ALAIN R. HUC __________ Appeal No. 1997-2436 Application 08/232,014 ___________ HEARD: JULY 11, 2000 ___________ Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge, McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and ROBINSON, Administrative Patent Judge. ROBINSON, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of claims 3-50, which are all of the claims pending in the application. Claims 23, 24, and 36 are illustrative of the claims on appeal and read as follows: 23. A process for the production of nanocapsules or nanoparticles, said nanocapsules or nanoparticles having a size of less than 800 nM, with crosslinked protein- based walls, which comprises preparing a nanoemulsion of at least one acylatable group- containing protein, said emulsion comprising a water phase, an oil phase, defining an 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007