Ex parte PERRIER et al. - Page 1




                             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                                 
                                 was not written for publication in a law journal and                                   
                                        is not binding precedent of the Board.                                          

                                                                                    Paper No. 29                        

                              UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                 
                                                     __________                                                         
                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                   
                                               AND INTERFERENCES                                                        
                                                     __________                                                         
                              Ex parte ERIC JEAN-LUC PERRIER and ALAIN R. HUC                                           
                                                     __________                                                         
                                                Appeal No. 1997-2436                                                    
                                                Application 08/232,014                                                  
                                                    ___________                                                         
                                               HEARD: JULY 11, 2000                                                     
                                                    ___________                                                         
              Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge, McKELVEY, Senior                                    
              Administrative Patent Judge, and ROBINSON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   
              ROBINSON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                    

                                               DECISION ON APPEAL                                                       
                     This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final                   
              rejection of claims 3-50, which are all of the claims pending in the application. Claims 23,              
              24, and 36 are illustrative of the claims on appeal and read as follows:                                  
                     23.    A process for the production of nanocapsules or nanoparticles, said                         
              nanocapsules or nanoparticles having a size of less than 800 nM, with crosslinked protein-                
              based walls, which comprises preparing a nanoemulsion of at least one acylatable group-                   
              containing protein, said emulsion comprising a water phase, an oil phase, defining an                     

                                                           1                                                            





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007