Ex parte KOLBERG - Page 4




               Appeal No. 1997-2532                                                                                               
               Application No. 08/427,569                                                                                         


                              (b)  contacting the product of step (a) with said oligonucleotide bound                             
                      to the solid phase;                                                                                         
                              (c)  thereafter separating materials not bound to the solid phase;                                  
                              (d)  contacting the bound product of step (c) with a nucleic acid                                   
                      multimer, said multimer comprising at least one oligonucleotide segment                                     
                      that is at least 90% homologous to the second segment of the amplifier                                      
                      probe polynucleotide [sic, oligonucleotide] and a multiplicity of second                                    
                      oligonucleotide segments that are at least 90% homologous to a labeled                                      
                      oligonucleotide;                                                                                            
                              (e)  removing unbound multimer;                                                                     
                              (f)   contacting the solid phase complex product of step (e) with the                               
                      labeled oligonucleotide;                                                                                    
                              (g)  removing unbound labeled oligonucleotide; and                                                  
                              (h)  detecting the presence of label in the solid phase complex                                     
                      product of step (g) and, thereby, detecting the presence of virus in the                                    
                      sample.                                                                                                     
                      The references relied on by the examiner are:                                                               
               Hogan et al. (Hogan)                          WO 88/03957                   June 2, 1988                           
                      (published International Application)                                                                       
               Urdea et al.  (Urdea)                         WO 89/03891                   May  5, 1989                           
                      (published International Application)                                                                       
               Seiki et al. (Seiki), "Human adult T-cell leukemia virus: Complete nucleotide sequence of                          
               the provirus genome integrated in leukemia cell DNA," Proceedings of the National                                  
               Academy of Sciences, USA, Vol. 80, pp. 3618-3622 (June 1983).                                                      
               Stratagene 1988 Catalog, p. 39 (Stratagene).                                                                       
               Ratner et al. (Ratner), "Nucleotide Sequence Analysis of Isolates of Human T-                                      
               Lymphotropic Virus Type I of Diverse Geographical Origins," AIDS Research and Human                                
               Retroviruses, Vol. 7, No. 11, pp. 923-941 (November 1991).                                                         
                                                           ISSUES2                                                                

                      2The examiner withdrew the final rejection of claims 17-36 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph,          
               as lacking enablement (see answer, para. bridging pp. 7-8).                                                        
                                                              - 4 -                                                               





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007