Ex parte ROSENFELD et al. - Page 9




          Appeal 1997-2572                                                            
          Application 08/220,562                                                      

                    A vessel for a metal smelting furnace having  a[5]                   
                    smelting zone including a heat-resistant interior                 
                    wall, and cooling means for protecting the interior               
                    of said vessel, characterized by                                  
                         (a) at least a portion of the interior wall of               
                    said vessel above the smelting zone consisting of at              
                    least one cooling pipe coil;                                      
                         (b) said coil including fluid passage-forming                
                    sections;                                                         
                         (c) said cooling pipe coil being exposed to the              
                    center of the vessel, and                                         
                         (d) neighboring sections of said coil being                  
                    arranged in a contacting relation.                                

               The Federal Circuit, commenting on the district court's                
          construction of the claim, notes (id. at 1282, 230 USPQ at                  
          46):                                                                        
                    The district court correctly observed that the                    
                    phrase "consisting of" appears in clause (a), not                 
                    the preamble of the claim, and thus limits only the               
                    element set forth in clause (a).  The [district]                  
                    court correctly declined to read this usage of                    
                    "consisting of" as excluding all other elements from              
                    the claim as a whole.                                             



             "Having" in the context of the Mannesmann claim means "comprising".5                                                                        
                                        - 9 -                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007