Ex parte VORACEK - Page 1




           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
                     publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.           
                                                                 Paper No. 19         
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    ____________                                      
                               Ex parte PAVEL VORACEK                                 
                                    ____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 1997-2627                                  
                             Application No. 08/424,122                               
                                    ____________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                    ____________                                      
          Before KIMLIN, OWENS and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent                 
          Judges.                                                                     
          OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of               
          claims 10-18, which are all of the claims remaining in the                  
          application.                                                                
                                    THE INVENTION                                     
               Appellant claims a device for electrical treatment of an               
          electrolytic solution, and claims solution fractions obtained               
          using this device.  Claims 10 and 13 are illustrative:                      








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007