The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 19 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte PAVEL VORACEK ____________ Appeal No. 1997-2627 Application No. 08/424,122 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before KIMLIN, OWENS and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judges. OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 10-18, which are all of the claims remaining in the application. THE INVENTION Appellant claims a device for electrical treatment of an electrolytic solution, and claims solution fractions obtained using this device. Claims 10 and 13 are illustrative:Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007