Appeal No. 1997-2627
Application No. 08/424,122
For the above reasons, we conclude that the examiner has
not carried the burden of establishing a prima facie case of
obviousness of the invention recited in either appellant’s
apparatus claims or solution fraction claims.
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007