Ex parte JIMENEZ et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)              
          was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is                 
          not binding precedent of the Board.                                         
                                                            Paper No. 21              
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                              Ex parte JORGE R. JIMENEZ                               
                                 PAUL W. PELLEGRINI                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 1997-2691                                  
                               Application 08/496,849                                 
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    
          Before FLEMING, RUGGIERO, and FRAHM, Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                     
          FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       

                                                                                     
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of               
          claims 1 through 7, all the claims pending in the application.              
               The invention relates to a schottky diode infrared                     
          detector with a voltage tunable cutoff wavelength.  Appellants              
          disclose on page 2 of the specification that their invention                
          is a schottky                                                               

                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007