Ex Parte IKEDA et al - Page 1




                       The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is            
                       not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                          
                                                                                                      Paper No. 27                  
                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                         
                                                          ____________                                                              
                                        BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                          
                                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                                               
                                                          ____________                                                              
                                      Ex parte TAKUYA IKEDA and MAKI KAMIKUBO                                                       
                                                          ____________                                                              
                                                      Appeal No. 1997-2947                                                          
                                                   Application No. 08/352,0791                                                      
                                                          ____________                                                              
                                                  HEARD: November 16, 2000                                                          
                                                          ____________                                                              
               Before PAK, WALTZ, and TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                        
               TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                
                                                    DECISION ON APPEAL                                                              
                       This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. §134 from the examiner’s refusal to allow claims 6-8                       
               and 11-12.  We affirm.                                                                                               


                                                          The Invention                                                             
                       The invention relates to a catalyst device for the purification of exhaust gas.  More                        
               particularly, the catalyst device comprises a three-way catalyst A and an absorption catalyst B.                     



                       1 Application for patent filed December 1, 1994.  This application claims priority to                        
               Japanese application 5-319,931 filed December 20, 1993.                                                              





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007