Ex Parte IKEDA et al - Page 17




               Appeal No. 1997-2947                                                                                                 
               Application No. 08/352,079                                                                                           


               optimize.”  (Appeal Brief, p. 7).5  Further, appellants argue that optimization is not “routine”                     
               unless the prior art recognizes that the variable to be optimized is result effective.                               
                       Abe suggests that the distance between catalyst A and B is a result effective variable.  At                  
               engine start-up, Abe describes passing electricity through a heater to:                                              
                       [H]eat the heater and simultaneously the HC’s [hydrocarbons] captured by zeolite begin                       
                       to be desorbed, and the main monolith catalyst and/or the catalyst supported on the heater,                  
                       generally arranged downstream of the zeolite adsorbent is momentarily heated whereby                         
                       the HC’s are reacted and purified.  (Abe, p. 5, lines 21-24).                                                
               Moreover, Abe is concerned about potential pressure loss occurring in the catalytic converter.                       
               (Abe, p. 8, lines 34-35).  In addressing the heating of the catalyst and adsorbent by the heater and                 
               the potential for pressure loss, Abe places constraints on the respective placement of the catalyst                  
               and adsorbent.  Thus, the catalyst and adsorbent of Abe must be placed at a distance from the                        
               heater which will allow each of them to be heated in a manner that allows for the conversion of                      
               the hydrocarbons.  Furthermore, one skilled in the art reading Abe would avoid placing the                           
               respective catalyst, heater and adsorbent at distances which could detrimentally affect the                          



                       5Contrary to appellants’ assertions, appellants’ specification describes the distance                        
               between the three-way catalyst and the adsorption catalyst as result effective.  Specifically, while                 
               the specification states that the distance is not critical, the specification recognizes that:                       
                       When the distance [between the catalyst and adsorption catalyst] is too near, there is a                     
                       possibility of causing the degradation of engine performance due to the rise of back                         
                       pressure, while when it is too apart from each other, the temperature of the catalyst                        
                       located at the downstream side is not raised and there is a possibility of degrading the                     
                       purification performance of the dropped-off HC.  (Specification, page 6-7).                                  
                                                                17                                                                  





Page:  Previous  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007