Appeal No. 1997-3094 Application 08/405,279 388, 392, 21 USPQ2d 1281, 1285 (Fed. Cir. 1991); In re De Blauwe, 736 F.2d 699, 705, 222 USPQ 191, 196 (Fed. Cir. 1984), and the comparison must be commensurate in scope with the claims. See In re Grasselli, 713 F.2d 731, 743, 218 USPQ 769, 778 (Fed. Cir. 1983); In re Clemens, 622 F.2d 1029, 1035, 206 USPQ 289, 296 (CCPA 1980). For the above reasons we affirm the rejection over Wan of claim 26 and the claims which depend therefrom. Rejection of claim 26 over Rudy in view of Belford Appellants argue that there is no disclosure in Rudy directed toward use of a catalytic material consisting essentially of a combination of ceria and a bulk second metal oxide to oxidize volatile organic fractions in a diesel exhaust gas stream (brief, page 14). Rudy’s teaching that his method is effective for treating exhaust spark ignition engines generally (col. 1, lines 18-20) would have fairly suggested, to one of ordinary skill in the art, use of the method to treat diesel engine exhaust. The fact that the temperatures used, i.e., at least about 400EC to 800EC (col. 3, lines 23-26), are within the range used by appellants, 12Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007