Appeal No. 1997-3205 Application 08/389,545 modifying a constant value of a deterministic model with a probabilistic deviation. Appellants are correct in stating that although Maguire teaches that deterministic calculations can be statistically or probabilistically based (see column 4, lines 10 to 14), Maguire still does not teach or suggest the feature recited in representative claim 1 of modifying a constant value of a deterministic model with a probabilistic deviation by defining a distribution of degradation values surrounding an expected degradation value at a particular time point to generate an index commensurate with an uncertainty at each time point. Therefore, we find that the feature recited in claims 1 to 10 on appeal, of generating an index commensurate with tube array degradation over time by modifying constant deterministic degradation values using a probabilistic model, is neither taught nor would have been suggested by the applied prior art to Clark and Maguire. Lastly, we are in agreement with appellants (Brief, pages 11 to 12 and 15) that Maguire fails to teach or suggest the salient feature of representative claim 1 of defining a distribution of degradation values surrounding an expected degradation value at a particular time point to generate an index commensurate with an uncertainty at each time point, thereby providing an uncertainty index. We are not persuaded that Maguire’s disclosed optimization analysis (see Maguire, column 15) relied upon by the examiner (see Answer, page 10) is the same as appellant’s claimed uncertainty index. We concluded that Maguire’s teachings of optimization of plant operations and performance would not 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007