Ex parte WELDY et al. - Page 1




                     THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                         
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)                  
          was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is                     
          not binding precedent of the Board.                                             
                                                               Paper No. 33               
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                          
                                      _____________                                       
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                             
                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                     
                                      _____________                                       
                                 Ex parte JOHN A. WELDY                                   
                                    and JAMES LAWTON                                      
                                      _____________                                       
                                  Appeal No.1997-3269                                     
                                 Application 07/918,517                                   
                                     ______________                                       
                                        ON BRIEF                                          
                                     _______________                                      
          Before JERRY SMITH, FLEMING, and LALL, Administrative Patent                    
          Judges.                                                                         
          FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judge.                                           





                                   DECISION ON APPEAL                                     
                     This is a decision on appeal from the final                          
          rejection of claims 9, 10 and 13.  Claims 1 through 8, 11 and                   
          12 have been allowed.                                                           


                                            1                                             





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007