Appeal No. 1997-3390 Application No. 08/354,384 invention." Para-Ordnance Mfg. v. SGS Importers Int'l, Inc., 73 F.3d 1085, 1087, 37 USPQ2d 1237, 1239 (Fed. Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 822 (1996) citing W.L. Gore & Assoc., Inc. v. Garlock, Inc., 721 F.2d 1540, 1548, 220 USPQ 303, 309 (Fed. Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 851 (1984). Appellants on page 5 of the brief argue that Santangelo teaches merely a method for low pressure deposition of metal layers on the back of a semiconductor substrate while Merz discloses flame spraying for coating metal substrates such as steel and copper. Appellants add that Merz does not provide any suggestion to use flame spraying for forming a metal layer on a semiconductor substrate. Additionally, Appellants on page 6 of the brief point out that bead or grit blasting of the substrate prior to flame spraying, as taught by Merz, destroys the surface of the semiconductor substrate of Santangelo. Appellants conclude that combining Merz with Santangelo is neither possible nor suggested by any of the references. The Examiner on pages 4 and 5 of the answer responds to Appellants’ arguments by stating that the reason to combine is taught by Merz in column 3, lines 53 and 54 that any suitable 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007