Appeal No. 1997-3443
Application No. 08/595,901
telluride (CdHgTe) to n-type material by way of ion implantation/etching so as to cause damage
in the p-type CdHgTe material. At column 9, lines 29-35, Baker has a teaching to the same
effect.
With respect to the rejection of claims 13-16, 19-22 and 25-28 as obvious over Baker and
Mc Adoo under 35 U.S.C. § 103, appellant does not argue against the obviousness of combining
the teachings thereof, but merely asserts the same alleged deficiencies of Baker. Because we
have found no such deficiencies in Baker, we will sustain the obviousness rejection of these
claims.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be
extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
STANLEY M. URYNOWICZ, JR. )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JAMES D. THOMAS ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
ERROL A. KRASS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
vsh
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007