Ex parte MARKUSCH et al. - Page 10




                 Appeal No. 1997-3609                                                                                                                   
                 Application No. 08/483,349                                                                                                             


                 novel characteristics of an applicant's composition as defined                                                                         
                 in the claim.  Janakirama-Rao, 317 F.2d at 954, 137 USPQ at                                                                            
                 896; see also Herz, 537 F.2d at 551-52, 190 USPQ at 463.  An                                                                           
                 applicant bears the initial burden of showing the basic and                                                                            
                 novel characteristics of a claimed composition.  In re De                                                                              
                 Lajarte, 337 F.2d 870, 874,                                                                                                            
                 143 USPQ 256, 258 (CCPA 1964).                                                                                                         
                          Our reading of appellants' specification appears to                                                                           
                 suggest that amines similar to the amines disclosed in Dormish                                                                         
                 may be included in the claimed adhesive composition.   See                                   3                                         
                 Specification, p. 17, lines 3-18.  Thus, upon return of this                                                                           
                 case to the examining group, we would urge the examiner to                                                                             
                 step back and consider whether the claims, read in light of                                                                            
                 the above-cited authority, reasonably exclude the presence of                                                                          
                 a diamine and/or triamine as required by Dormish.  In so                                                                               
                 doing, the examiner should review the specification, the                                                                               
                 reference and any showing by appellants relating to the basic                                                                          
                 and novel characteristics of the claimed adhesive to determine                                                                         


                          3It further appears that fillers may be included in the                                                                       
                 claimed adhesive composition.  See Specification, p. 18, lines                                                                         
                 4-7.                                                                                                                                   
                                                                          10                                                                            





Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007