Appeal No. 1997-3611
Application No. 08/439,414
(1) Determine whether Rackovan is qualified as “prior art”
for purposes of 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103; and
(2) Determine whether Freedman taken together with Rackovan
(if qualified as “prior art”) and/or Dudley would have
rendered the claimed subject matter obvious within the meaning
of 35 U.S.C.
§ 103.
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007