Appeal No. 1997-3731
Application No. 08/152,089
The following rejection is before us for review.2
2On page 2 of the final rejection (Paper No. 25), the
examiner included two respective rejections of claims 1 and 3
through 7. On page 3 of the main answer (Paper No. 31), the
examiner withdrew the references Levinstein ‘201 (sic,‘516)
and IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin from the first
rejection, and withdrew the entirety of the second rejection
(although Roland et al and Japanese patent ‘534 were not
mentioned, apparently inadvertently). The rejection now before
is the aforesaid first rejection from the final rejection,
without the Levinstein ‘516 and IBM Technical Disclosure
Bulletin documents.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007