Appeal No. 1997-3823 Application No. 08/320,782 1990 Landis 4,945,573 Aug. 7, 1990 Kamaya et al. (Kamaya) 5,106,179 Apr. 21, 1992 Furness et al. (Furness) 5,162,828 Nov. 10, 1992 Claims 1-5, 25-34, 37 and 38 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Furness. Claims 6, 7, 11, 14-16 and 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Furness in view of Flader. Claims 46 and 49-51 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Furness in view of Kamaya. Claims 47 and 48 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Furness in view of Kamaya as applied to claims 46 and 49-51 and further in view of Weyer. Claims 52-54 and 57-59 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Furness in view of Landis. Claim 62 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007