Appeal No. 1997-3823
Application No. 08/320,782
1990
Landis 4,945,573 Aug. 7,
1990
Kamaya et al. (Kamaya) 5,106,179 Apr. 21,
1992
Furness et al. (Furness) 5,162,828 Nov.
10, 1992
Claims 1-5, 25-34, 37 and 38 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Furness.
Claims 6, 7, 11, 14-16 and 20 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Furness in view of
Flader.
Claims 46 and 49-51 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over Furness in view of Kamaya.
Claims 47 and 48 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Furness in view of Kamaya as applied
to claims 46 and 49-51 and further in view of Weyer.
Claims 52-54 and 57-59 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
103 as being unpatentable over Furness in view of Landis.
Claim 62 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007