Ex parte KUENSTER et al. - Page 4




          Appeal No. 1997-3823                                                        
          Application No. 08/320,782                                                  
                                                                                     
                                                                                     
          1990                                                                        
          Landis                        4,945,573                Aug.  7,             
          1990                                                                        
          Kamaya et al. (Kamaya)        5,106,179                Apr. 21,             
          1992                                                                        
          Furness et al. (Furness)           5,162,828                Nov.            
          10, 1992                                                                    


               Claims 1-5, 25-34, 37 and 38 stand rejected under 35                   
          U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Furness.                            
               Claims 6, 7, 11, 14-16 and 20 stand rejected under 35                  
          U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Furness in view of                  
          Flader.                                                                     
               Claims 46 and 49-51 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103               
          as being unpatentable over Furness in view of Kamaya.                       
               Claims 47 and 48 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as               
          being unpatentable over Furness in view of Kamaya as applied                
          to claims 46 and 49-51 and further in view of Weyer.                        
               Claims 52-54 and 57-59 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                
          103 as being unpatentable over Furness in view of Landis.                   
               Claim 62 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                
                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007