Ex parte WILLIAMS et al. - Page 4




                     Appeal No. 1997-4002                                                                                                                                              
                     Application 08/459,880                                                                                                                                            


                     appendix to the brief, is illustrative of the appealed subject                                                                                                    
                     matter.                                                                                                                                                           
                                The references of record relied upon by the examiner in                                                                                                
                     support of a rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 are:                                                                                                                 
                                Schirmer                                   4,606,922                                             Aug. 19, 1986                                         
                                Ferguson                                   4,765,857                                             Aug. 23, 1988                                         



                                Claims 25-27, 29 and 32-35 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                                                                                              
                     § 103 as being unpatentable over Ferguson in view of                                                                                                              
                     Schirmer.5                                                                                                                                                        
                                The rejection is explained in the examiner’s answer                                                                                                    
                     (Paper No. 16, mailed April 28, 1997).                                                                                                                            
                                The opposing viewpoints of appellants are set forth in                                                                                                 
                     the brief (Paper No. 14, filed March 28, 1997).                                                                                                                   
                                Independent claim 25 calls for a side-seal bag having a                                                                                                
                     patch “covering at least a segment of the bottomline” of the                                                                                                      
                     bag.  Claim 34, the only other independent claim on appeal,                                                                                                       
                     contains identical language.  The examiner concedes that                                                                                                          

                                5The final rejection (Paper No. 10) also included                                                                                                      
                     rejections of the appealed claims under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first                                                                                                    
                     and second paragraphs.  However, the examiner has withdrawn                                                                                                       
                     these rejections.  See page 3 of the answer.                                                                                                                      
                                                                                          4                                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007