Appeal No. 1997-4002 Application 08/459,880 correspond to the claimed subject matter in all respects. We have carefully reviewed the appealed claims, appellants’ specification, the applied references, and the respective viewpoints of appellants and the examiner. As a consequence of our review, we conclude that the standing § 103 rejection is not sustainable. Rejections based on 35 U.S.C. § 103 must rest on a factual basis. In re Warner, 379 F.2d 1011, 1017, 154 USPQ 173, 177-78 (CCPA 1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1057 (1968). In making such a rejection, the examiner has the initial duty of supplying the requisite factual basis and may not, because of doubts that the invention is patentable, resort to speculation, unfounded assumptions or hindsight reconstruction to supply deficiencies in the factual basis. Id. We fully appreciate that in Ferguson, the patch 8 is sized such that it covers and protects a substantial portion of one or both sides of a flattened, lay-flat bag (column 3, lines 6-10). While Ferguson’s patch 8 approaches the edges of the bag in its flattened lay-flat position, it is clear that it does not in any sense cover an edge of the lay-flat bag. 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007