Ex parte HARTLEY et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1997-4050                                                        
          Application 08/535,317                                                      


          1.  A microstructural transducer, comprising:                               
          a microstructural platform;                                                 
          a movable microstructural member;                                           
          a microstructural linkage elastically coupling said movable                 
          microstructural member to said microstructural platform;                    
          measuring means for sensing displacement of said movable                    
          microstructural member relative to said platform;                           
          first control means for inducing a first force field in                     
          response to said displacement; and                                          
          second control means for inducing a second force field near                 
          said movable member in accordance with a predetermined stimulus.            
                                                                                     
          9.  The transducer of Claim 1 wherein said second force field               
          is an electrostatic field and said second control means comprises           
          a conductive platen on said platform which is held at a voltage to          
          generate said electrostatic field.                                          
          The references relied upon by the examiner as evidence of                   
          obviousness are:                                                            
          Hulsing, II (Hulsing)          4,459,759          Jul. 17, 1984             
          Henrion et al. (Henrion)       5,134,881          Aug. 04, 1992             
          Claims 1, 3-9 and 12-27 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103                
          as unpatentable over Henrion.                                               
          Claims 2, 10, 11, 28, 50-57 and 59 stand rejected under                     
          35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Henrion in view of Hulsing.            
          The respective positions of the examiner and the appellants                 
          with regard to the propriety of these rejections are set forth in           
          the final rejection (Paper No. 23) and the examiner’s answer                
          (Paper No. 31), and the appellants’ brief (Paper No. 28).                   

                                            2                                         




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007