Ex parte HARTLEY et al. - Page 10




          Appeal No. 1997-4050                                                        
          Application 08/535,317                                                      


          Only claims 9 and 10 require that the second force field is                 
          an electrostatic field.  We agree with the examiner that one of             
          ordinary skill in the art recognized at the time the invention was          
          made that                                                                   
          electrostatic and magnetic force fields could be used to                    
          manipulate the relationship between two objects.  This is                   
          evidenced by Henrion, which uses electrostatic fields, and                  
          Hulsing, which utilizes magnetic fields.  Because Henrion’s                 
          apparatus utilizes electrostatic fields produced by voltage                 
          energized plates such as 90’ in Figure 13, one of ordinary skill            
          in the art desiring to add a caging function to the apparatus to            
          hold mass 36 in a fixed position to avoid damage to the apparatus           
          would have utilized such voltage energized plates because such              
          structures are already present in the Henrion apparatus.  To                
          utilize a magnetic force field in Henrion would have involved               
          adding magnetic field producing coils such as 52, 57 taught by              
          Hulsing, significantly modifying Henrion’s structure.                       








                                            10                                        




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007