Ex parte ANDREWS et al. - Page 11




            Appeal No. 1997-4259                                                                         
            Application No. 08/259,474                                                                   


            With regard to claim 12 on appeal, we reach a different                                      
            result.  Claim 12 is directed to a surgically implantable                                    
            prosthesis containing any filler material that is "capable of                                
            being provided in a range of viscosities thereby permitting                                  
            the filler material to have a selectable viscosity."  It is                                  
            the examiner’s position (answer, page 7) that the                                            
            triglycerides of Destouet are "clearly capable of being                                      
            provided in a range of viscosities."  We agree with the                                      
            examiner.  Peanut oil and sunflower seed oil that may be                                     
            subjected to different processing parameters or provided with                                
            some form of thickening agent are inherently "capable of being                               
            provided in a range of viscosities" (emphasis added), thus                                   
            permitting them to be produced with a selectable viscosity.                                  


            In a case such as this, where there is a reasonable basis                                    
            to conclude that a given property or characteristic for                                      
            establishing novelty in the claimed subject matter may, in                                   
            fact, be an inherent characteristic of the prior art product,                                
            it is incumbent upon appellants to prove that the prior art                                  
            products do not in fact possess the characteristics relied                                   
            upon.  See In re Spada, 911 F.2d 705, 708, 15 USPQ2d 1655,                                   
                                                   11                                                    





Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007