Ex parte ANDREWS et al. - Page 16




            Appeal No. 1997-4259                                                                         
            Application No. 08/259,474                                                                   


                  Like appellants (brief, pages 12-15), we are of the                                    
            opinion that the examiner has entirely misconstrued the scope                                
            of the appellants’ admission on page 6 of the specification.                                 
            While appellants do concede that triglyceride compositions                                   
            like those of the invention "can be prepared using standard                                  
            methods known to those skilled in the art such as by reacting                                
            pure, fully saturated fatty acids of the desired carbon length                               
            with purified glycerol in an esterification reaction" and that                               
            the resulting triglycerides are purified from the reaction                                   
            mixture by known techniques to provide a pure, non-                                          
            contaminated triglyceride, they have in no way admitted that                                 
            changing the viscosity to be that which is disclosed and                                     
            claimed in the present application is known in the art to be                                 
            achievable by any such method, as has been suggested by the                                  
            examiner.  Nor has the examiner put forth any factual basis to                               
            support a conclusion that any of the other characteristics set                               
            forth in the claims subject to this rejection are known in the                               
            art or would have been the natural result flowing from                                       
            producing a synthetic triglyceride by using the admittedly old                               
            process mentioned by appellants.  For these reasons, we will                                 
            not sustain the examiner’s rejection of claims 2                                             
                                                   16                                                    





Page:  Previous  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007