Appeal No. 1997-4385
Application No. 08/288,864
Claims 19 and 25 are representative and are reproduced in an
appendix to the brief.
The prior art references of record relied upon by the
examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:
Evans 2,888,096 May 26,
1959
Suzuki et al. (Suzuki) 4,285,142 Aug. 25,
1981 Dewitz et al. (Dewitz) 4,731,228
Mar. 15, 1988 Kalen et al. (Kalen) 5,207,805
May 04, 1993
The following rejections are before us for review:
(I) claims 19 through 24 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 102(b) as being anticipated by Dewitz; and
(II) claim 25 through 29 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 102(b) as being anticipated by Evans or Suzuki or Kalen.
The full text of the examiner's rejections and responses
to the arguments presented by the appellant appears in the
answer
(Paper No. 13), while the complete statement of the
appellant’s arguments can be found in the brief (Paper No.
12).
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007