Ex parte BANJYO et al. - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of                 
          the Board.                                                                  


                                                            Paper No. 31              


                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                    _____________                                     
                             Ex parte TOSHINOBU BANJYO,                               
                        MASATAKA TAKEHARA, SHINICHI HASEGAWA                          
                                        and                                           
                                    HARUO YOSHIDA                                     
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 1997-4387                                  
                               Application 08/308,963                                 
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    

          Before FRANKFORT, PATE and STAAB, Administrative Patent                     
          Judges.                                                                     
          PATE,, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
                    This is an appeal from the examiner's refusal to                  
          allow claims 1 through 10, 15, and 16, as amended after final               



                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007