Appeal No. 1997-4444
Application 08/427,884
Claims 19 and 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Yamakawa in view of Elliott as applied
to claim 14, further in view of Uchiumi and Verhagen.
Claim 23 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Satoh as applied to claim 22, further in
view of Yamakawa.
Claim 27 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Yamakawa.
Claim 28 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Yamakawa as applied to claim 27, further in
view of Uchiumi, Tomita, and Elliott.
We refer to the Final Rejection (Paper No. 6) (pages
referred to as "FR__") and the Examiner's Answer (Paper
No. 15) (pages referred to as "EA__") for a statement of the
Examiner's position and to the Appeal Brief (Paper No. 14)
(pages referred to as "Br__"), filed February 11, 1997, for a
statement of Appellant's arguments thereagainst.
OPINION
35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph
In the Final Rejection, the Examiner suggested changes to
overcome the § 112, second paragraph, rejection. Appellant
- 5 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007