THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte ERIC A. VOIT
__________
Appeal No. 1998-0015
Application 08/388,058
__________
HEARD: APRIL 18, 2000
__________
Before HAIRSTON, KRASS and GROSS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims
1 through 36. After submission of the brief, the examiner
allowed claims 9 through 19 and 32 through 36. Accordingly,
claims 1 through 8 and 20 through 31 remain before us on
appeal.
The disclosed invention relates to a system in which
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007