THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not
written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 34
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KAZUO KONISHI, SHIMPEI YOSHIOKA, KOJI
MARUYAMA, TOMOYUKI MAEKAWA, and TOSHIAKI SATO
____________
Appeal No. 1998-0063
Application No. 08/057,805
____________
HEARD: February 24, 2000
____________
Before KRASS, JERRY SMITH, and GROSS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 4 and 7 through 18. Claims 5
and 6 have been canceled. In an After Final amendment filed
April 28, 1997, claim 18 was canceled. Accordingly, claims 1
through 4 and 7 through 17 remain before us on appeal.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007