Ex parte ROBERTSON et al. - Page 9




          Appeal No. 1998-0072                                                        
          Application No. 08/476,786                                                  


          seems to be of the position that any decoder which is                       
          programmable would satisfy the language of the claims.  We do               
          not agree.  A programmable decoder is not necessarily                       
          programmable to achieve the function recited in the claims.                 
          We also agree with appellants that the logic gate                           
          array described in Bowers is not related to the decoders of                 
          the dual- ported memory.  The logic gate array of Bowers                    
          merely provides programmability of how the data in the memory               
          is to be used.  The decoders shown in Figure 6 of Bowers are                
          fixed decoders, that is not programmable, for the reasons                   
          argued by appellants.  Since the decoders of Bowers are                     
          neither programmable nor programmable for the purpose recited               
          in the claims, we do not sustain the rejection of the claims                
          based on Mason and Bowers.                                                  









                                                                                     


                                         -9-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007