THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 31
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte SHADI L. MALHOTRA
__________
Appeal No.1998-0189
Application 08/196,9331
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before: WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge, and McKELVEY, Senior
Administrative Judge, and SCHEINER, Administrative Patent Judge.
PER CURIAM
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed February 15, 1994. According to appellant the
application is a continuation-in-part of Application 08/033,917, filed March 19, 1993 and
08/033,918, filed March 19, 1993. The real party in interest is Xerox.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007