Appeal No. 1998-0236 Application No. 08/472,536 11. Claims 22 and 23 as unpatentable over Pottschmidt in view of Hannum and Nelson; 12. Claims 22 and 23 as unpatentable over Pottschmidt in view of Tasaka and Nelson; 13. Claims 24-26, 28 and 29 as unpatentable over Bianco in view of Pottschmidt, Nelson and Kranjec; 14. Claims 30-32 and 35-37 as unpatentable over Bianco in view of Perkins; 15. Claim 33 as unpatentable over Bianco in view of Bridge and Perkins; 16. Claim 34 as unpatentable over Bianco in view of Vivoli and Perkins; and 17. Claim 38 as unpatentable over Bianco in view of Perkins and Jory. Reference is made to the examiner’s answer for details of the foregoing rejections. Considering first the rejections of claims 1, 24 through 26, 28 and 29, independent claim 1 recites, inter alia, a bed and tabs formed at the end portions of the bed’s side rails for removably mounting the side rails on the support posts. Independent claim 24 similarly recites that 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007