Ex parte HUBBAUER et al. - Page 9




          Appeal No. 1998-0259                                                        
          Application No. 08/391,817                                                  


               For each rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 102, the                          
               argument shall specify the errors in the rejection                     
               and why the rejected claims are patentable under 35                    
               U.S.C. § 102, including any specific limitations in                    
               the rejected claims which are not described in the                     
               prior art relied upon in the rejection.                                

          Thus, 37 CFR § 1.192 provides that just as the court is not                 
          under any burden to raise and/or consider such issues this                  
          board is not under any greater burden.                                      
               In view of the foregoing, the decision of the Examiner                 
          rejecting claims 1 through 20 and 23 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 is               
          affirmed.                                                                   


















               No time period for taking any subsequent action in                     
                                          9                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007