Appeal No. 1998-0259 Application No. 08/391,817 For each rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 102, the argument shall specify the errors in the rejection and why the rejected claims are patentable under 35 U.S.C. § 102, including any specific limitations in the rejected claims which are not described in the prior art relied upon in the rejection. Thus, 37 CFR § 1.192 provides that just as the court is not under any burden to raise and/or consider such issues this board is not under any greater burden. In view of the foregoing, the decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 1 through 20 and 23 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in 9Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007