Ex parte PEYMAN - Page 4




          Appeal No. 1998-0308                                                        
          Application 07/844,879                                                      


                                   THE REJECTIONS                                     


               Claim 1 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                 
          unpatentable over Krwawicz in view of L’Esperance ‘608,                     
          L’Esperance ‘541 and L’Esperance ‘913.                                      


               Claims 2 through 6, 15 through 19 and 25 through 32 stand              
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                   
          Krwawicz in view of L’Esperance ‘608, L’Esperance ‘541,                     
          L’Esperance ‘913 and Bath.                                                  


               Claims 7 through 14 and 20 through 23 stand rejected                   
          under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Krwawicz in                
          view of L’Esperance ‘608, L’Esperance ‘541, L’Esperance ‘913,               
          Bath and Peyman.                                                            


               Reference is made to the appellant’s main and reply                    
          briefs (Paper Nos. 18 and 21) and to the examiner’s answer                  
          (Paper No. 19) for the respective positions of the appellant                
          and the examiner with regard to the merits of these                         


                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007