THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 11 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte JOHN M. KAISER, WARREN E. MAULE and DAVID W. VICTOR ____________ Appeal No. 1998-0429 Application No. 08/537,187 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH, and DIXON, Administrative Patent Judges. DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-10, which are all of the claims pending in this application. We AFFIRM. BACKGROUND The appellants’ invention relates to an information handling system including non-disruptive command and data movement between storage and one or more auxiliaryPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007