Ex parte KAISER et al. - Page 1

                             THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                 

                   The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for                     
                       publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                        
                                                                                                Paper No. 11              
                                UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                 
                                     BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                   
                                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                                        
                                 Ex parte JOHN M. KAISER, WARREN E. MAULE and                                             
                                                    DAVID W. VICTOR                                                       
                                                  Appeal No. 1998-0429                                                    
                                                Application No. 08/537,187                                                
                                                        ON BRIEF                                                          
              Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH, and DIXON, Administrative Patent Judges.                                      
              DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                         

                                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                                       

                     This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-10,                     
              which are all of the claims pending in this application.                                                    
                     We AFFIRM.                                                                                           

                     The appellants’ invention relates to an information handling system including                        
              non-disruptive command and data movement between storage and one or more auxiliary                          

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007